Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w35416280 →Countries where authors are citing Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
This map shows the geographic impact of Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
This network shows the impact of Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.
About Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
This paper, published in 2011, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Jean‐Paul Fitoussi, Amartya Sen and Joseph E. Stiglitz covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (649 citations), Economics and Econometrics (575 citations) and Social Psychology (570 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w35416280.