Optimizing Compilers for Modern Architectures: A Dependence-based Approach

632 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2001, received 632 indexed citations. Written by Ken Kennedy and John R. Allen covering the research area of Information Systems, Hardware and Architecture and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Hardware and Architecture (544 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (446 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (109 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w35392850 →

Countries where authors are citing Optimizing Compilers for Modern Architectures: A Dependence-based Approach

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Optimizing Compilers for Modern Architectures: A Dependence-based Approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Optimizing Compilers for Modern Architectures: A Dependence-based Approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Optimizing Compilers for Modern Architectures: A Dependence-based Approach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Optimizing Compilers for Modern Architectures: A Dependence-based Approach

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Optimizing Compilers for Modern Architectures: A Dependence-based Approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Optimizing Compilers for Modern Architectures: A Dependence-based Approach.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w35392850.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026