Meaning And Void: Inner Experience and the Incentives in People’s Lives

425 indexed citations
published 1978
Authors
Eric Klinger

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w35143836 →

Countries where authors are citing Meaning And Void: Inner Experience and the Incentives in People’s Lives

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meaning And Void: Inner Experience and the Incentives in People’s Lives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meaning And Void: Inner Experience and the Incentives in People’s Lives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meaning And Void: Inner Experience and the Incentives in People’s Lives more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Meaning And Void: Inner Experience and the Incentives in People’s Lives

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Meaning And Void: Inner Experience and the Incentives in People’s Lives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Meaning And Void: Inner Experience and the Incentives in People’s Lives.

About Meaning And Void: Inner Experience and the Incentives in People’s Lives

This paper, published in 1978, received 425 indexed citations . Written by Eric Klinger. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (231 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (140 citations), Applied Psychology (131 citations), Clinical Psychology (123 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (75 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w35143836.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact