Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars.
- Authors
- Moira MaguireBrid Delahunt
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w34902304 →Countries where authors are citing Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars.
This map shows the geographic impact of Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars.
This network shows the impact of Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars..
About Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars.
This paper, published in 2017, received 956 indexed citations . Written by Moira Maguire and Brid Delahunt. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (222 citations), Sociology and Political Science (209 citations) and General Health Professions (153 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w34902304.