El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas

134 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1987, received 134 indexed citations. Written by Norbert Elias covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and General Social Sciences. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (49 citations), Education (21 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (19 citations). Published in Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w34790129 →

Countries where authors are citing El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w34790129.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026