The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Xuequn Wang
- Journal
- eScholarship (California Digital Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3471449 →Countries where authors are citing The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China
This map shows the geographic impact of The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China
This network shows the impact of The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China.
About The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China
This paper, published in 2013, received 109 indexed citations . Written by Xuequn Wang covering the research area of Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (53 citations), Economics and Econometrics (52 citations), Sociology and Political Science (21 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (16 citations) and Strategy and Management (15 citations). Published in eScholarship (California Digital Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3471449.