Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow Crystals

382 indexed citations
published 1966
Journal
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3469970 →

Countries where authors are citing Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow Crystals

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow Crystals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow Crystals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow Crystals more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow Crystals

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow Crystals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow Crystals.

About Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow Crystals

This paper, published in 1966, received 382 indexed citations . Written by Chôji Magono covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Atmospheric Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (321 citations), Global and Planetary Change (217 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (93 citations). Published in Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3469970.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026