Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method
- Authors
- Allen Taflove
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3454197 →Countries where authors are citing Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method
This map shows the geographic impact of Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method
This network shows the impact of Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method.
About Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method
This paper, published in 1998, received 474 indexed citations . Written by Allen Taflove covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (365 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (256 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (92 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3454197.