Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria
- Authors
- Lisa Wedeen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w33903164 →Countries where authors are citing Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria
This map shows the geographic impact of Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria
This network shows the impact of Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria.
About Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria
This paper, published in 1999, received 570 indexed citations . Written by Lisa Wedeen covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (471 citations), Political Science and International Relations (267 citations) and Anthropology (46 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w33903164.