Transcultural Nursing : Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice

469 indexed citations
published 1989
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w33876717 →

Countries where authors are citing Transcultural Nursing : Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Transcultural Nursing : Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Transcultural Nursing : Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transcultural Nursing : Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Transcultural Nursing : Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Transcultural Nursing : Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Transcultural Nursing : Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice.

About Transcultural Nursing : Concepts, Theories, Research and Practice

This paper, published in 1989, received 469 indexed citations . Written by Madeleine Leininger and Marilyn McFarland covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (263 citations), General Health Professions (161 citations) and Clinical Psychology (134 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w33876717.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026