Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World
- Authors
- Bruce Schneier
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w33613435 →Countries where authors are citing Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World
This map shows the geographic impact of Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World
This network shows the impact of Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World.
About Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World
This paper, published in 2015, received 243 indexed citations . Written by Bruce Schneier covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (126 citations), Information Systems (69 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (46 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w33613435.