The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.

1.9k indexed citations
published 2000

Countries where authors are citing The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes..

About The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.

This paper, published in 2000, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Moira Stewart, Judith Belle Brown, Allan Donner, Ian R. McWhinney, W. Wayne Weston and John Jordan covering the research area of General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (1.3k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (497 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (422 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (161 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (132 citations). Published in PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w33299154.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026