The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates

890 indexed citations
published 1999
Journal
Research Online (University of Wollongong)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w33230732 →

Countries where authors are citing The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates.

About The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates

This paper, published in 1999, received 890 indexed citations . Written by George Paxinos, Xu‐Feng Huang and Arthur W. Toga covering the research area of Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (519 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (304 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (142 citations). Published in Research Online (University of Wollongong).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w33230732.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026