An Empirical Evaluation of Thompson Sampling
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Artificial Intelligence
- Management Science and Operations Research
- Authors
- Olivier ChapelleLihong Li
- Journal
- Neural Information Processing Systems
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3276683 →Countries where authors are citing An Empirical Evaluation of Thompson Sampling
This map shows the geographic impact of An Empirical Evaluation of Thompson Sampling. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An Empirical Evaluation of Thompson Sampling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An Empirical Evaluation of Thompson Sampling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An Empirical Evaluation of Thompson Sampling
This network shows the impact of An Empirical Evaluation of Thompson Sampling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An Empirical Evaluation of Thompson Sampling.
About An Empirical Evaluation of Thompson Sampling
This paper, published in 2011, received 492 indexed citations . Written by Olivier Chapelle and Lihong Li covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (349 citations), Artificial Intelligence (289 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (96 citations). Published in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3276683.