Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w32676195 →Countries where authors are citing Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species
This map shows the geographic impact of Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species
This network shows the impact of Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species.
About Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species
This paper, published in 1989, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by J. P. Grime, John Hodgson and Roderick Hunt. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (875 citations), Plant Science (766 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (493 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w32676195.