Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS2010)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w32583961 →Countries where authors are citing Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS2010)
This map shows the geographic impact of Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS2010). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS2010) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS2010) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS2010)
This network shows the impact of Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS2010). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS2010).
About Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS2010)
This paper, published in 2010, received 577 indexed citations . Written by Tommi Tervonen, de Bert Brock, de Pieter Graeff and Hans L. Hillege. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (169 citations), Information Systems (133 citations) and Management Information Systems (132 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w32583961.