Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w32465865 →Countries where authors are citing Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels
This map shows the geographic impact of Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels
This network shows the impact of Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels.
About Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels
This paper, published in 1993, received 157 indexed citations . Written by Bruce J. Malina and Richard L. Rohrbaugh covering the research area of Religious studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Religious studies (133 citations), Sociology and Political Science (84 citations), Archeology (38 citations), Development (25 citations) and Philosophy (8 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w32465865.