Human cytomegalovirus infection and expression in human malignant glioma.

559 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 559 indexed citations. Written by Charles Cobbs, Lualhati Harkins, Minu Samanta, G. Yancey Gillespie, Suman Bharara, Peter H. King, Burt Nabors, C. Glenn Cobbs and William J. Britt covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Parasitology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (383 citations), Immunology (200 citations) and Oncology (191 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w32315743 →

Countries where authors are citing Human cytomegalovirus infection and expression in human malignant glioma.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Human cytomegalovirus infection and expression in human malignant glioma.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Human cytomegalovirus infection and expression in human malignant glioma. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human cytomegalovirus infection and expression in human malignant glioma. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Human cytomegalovirus infection and expression in human malignant glioma.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Human cytomegalovirus infection and expression in human malignant glioma.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Human cytomegalovirus infection and expression in human malignant glioma..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w32315743.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026