Orthodontics, current principles and techniques
Impact in
- Orthodontics 642
- Oral Surgery 351
Classified as
- Authors
- T.M. GraberRobert L. Vanarsdall
- Journal
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w31897332 →Countries where authors are citing Orthodontics, current principles and techniques
This map shows the geographic impact of Orthodontics, current principles and techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Orthodontics, current principles and techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orthodontics, current principles and techniques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Orthodontics, current principles and techniques
This network shows the impact of Orthodontics, current principles and techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Orthodontics, current principles and techniques.
About Orthodontics, current principles and techniques
This paper, published in 1985, received 827 indexed citations . Written by T.M. Graber and Robert L. Vanarsdall covering the research area of Anatomy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Orthodontics (642 citations), Oral Surgery (351 citations), Molecular Biology (278 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (245 citations) and Genetics (111 citations). Published in LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w31897332.