Where the really hard problems are
- Journal
- International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3174287 →Countries where authors are citing Where the really hard problems are
This map shows the geographic impact of Where the really hard problems are. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Where the really hard problems are with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Where the really hard problems are more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Where the really hard problems are
This network shows the impact of Where the really hard problems are. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Where the really hard problems are.
About Where the really hard problems are
This paper, published in 1991, received 591 indexed citations . Written by Peter Cheeseman, Bob Kanefsky and William M. Taylor covering the research area of Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (386 citations), Artificial Intelligence (305 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (174 citations). Published in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3174287.