Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools
- Authors
- David AvisonG. Fitzgerald
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3112910 →Countries where authors are citing Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools
This map shows the geographic impact of Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools
This network shows the impact of Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools.
About Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools
This paper, published in 1995, received 536 indexed citations . Written by David Avison and G. Fitzgerald. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (232 citations), Management Information Systems (219 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (157 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3112910.