Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w31089716 →Countries where authors are citing Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines.
This map shows the geographic impact of Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines.
This network shows the impact of Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines..
About Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines.
This paper, published in 1990, received 545 indexed citations . Written by Jiří Bártek, Richard Iggo, Julian Gannon and David P. Lane covering the research area of Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (415 citations), Molecular Biology (286 citations) and Cancer Research (155 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w31089716.