The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.
- Authors
- Edward F. McCarthy
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3094636 →Countries where authors are citing The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.
This map shows the geographic impact of The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.
This network shows the impact of The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas..
About The toxins of William B. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.
This paper, published in 2006, received 568 indexed citations . Written by Edward F. McCarthy covering the research area of Biotechnology, Immunology and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (298 citations), Immunology (274 citations) and Biotechnology (164 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3094636.