Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary

927 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1977, received 927 indexed citations. Written by Andrew D. Miall covering the research area of Earth-Surface Processes, Soil Science and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Earth-Surface Processes (688 citations), Atmospheric Science (549 citations) and Geophysics (284 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w30706434 →

Countries where authors are citing Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w30706434.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026