Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials

262 indexed citations
published 1997

Countries where authors are citing Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials.

About Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials

This paper, published in 1997, received 262 indexed citations . Written by T. J. Bernatowicz and E. Zinner covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics and Archeology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (247 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (42 citations) and Geophysics (37 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w30634143.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026