The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm
- Authors
- Kenji KiraLarry Rendell
- Journal
- National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3006701 →Countries where authors are citing The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm
This map shows the geographic impact of The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm
This network shows the impact of The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm.
About The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm
This paper, published in 1992, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Kenji Kira and Larry Rendell covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (640 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (330 citations) and Information Systems (237 citations). Published in National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3006701.