Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design

459 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 459 indexed citations. Written by Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Yuqing Ren, Yan Chen, Moira Burke, John Riedl and Joseph A. Konstan covering the research area of Communication and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Communication (234 citations), Sociology and Political Science (193 citations) and Computer Science Applications (131 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w29737930 →

Countries where authors are citing Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w29737930.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026