Tumors of the heart; review of the subject and report of 150 cases.
- Authors
- Prichard Rw
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w29694306 →Countries where authors are citing Tumors of the heart; review of the subject and report of 150 cases.
This map shows the geographic impact of Tumors of the heart; review of the subject and report of 150 cases.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tumors of the heart; review of the subject and report of 150 cases. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tumors of the heart; review of the subject and report of 150 cases. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Tumors of the heart; review of the subject and report of 150 cases.
This network shows the impact of Tumors of the heart; review of the subject and report of 150 cases.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Tumors of the heart; review of the subject and report of 150 cases..
About Tumors of the heart; review of the subject and report of 150 cases.
This paper, published in 1951, received 259 indexed citations . Written by Prichard Rw covering the research area of Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (237 citations), Surgery (143 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (115 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w29694306.