Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process

1.9k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2000, received 1.9k indexed citations. Written by Thomas L. Saaty covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (607 citations), Strategy and Management (256 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (241 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w29396978 →

Countries where authors are citing Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w29396978.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026