The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries.

521 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 521 indexed citations. Written by Björn Hibell, Ulf Guttormsson, Salme Ahlström, O. M. Balakireva, Þóroddur Bjarnason, Anna Kokkevi and Ludwig Kraus covering the research area of Speech and Hearing and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (283 citations), General Health Professions (186 citations) and Clinical Psychology (132 citations). Published in UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w29126720 →

Countries where authors are citing The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w29126720.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026