Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w28976573 →Countries where authors are citing Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality
This map shows the geographic impact of Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality
This network shows the impact of Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality.
About Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality
This paper, published in 1976, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Frank M. Andrews and Stephen B. Withey covering the research area of Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (989 citations), Sociology and Political Science (429 citations) and General Health Professions (416 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w28976573.