Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w28895192 →Countries where authors are citing Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology
This map shows the geographic impact of Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology
This network shows the impact of Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.
About Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology
This paper, published in 1988, received 488 indexed citations . Written by Winslow R. Briggs, Russell L. Jones, Virginia Walbot, Christopher R. Somerville and Deborah P. Delmer. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (371 citations), Molecular Biology (163 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (67 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w28895192.