Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications
- Authors
- Ian HutchbyRobin Wooffitt
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w28662241 →Countries where authors are citing Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications
This map shows the geographic impact of Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications
This network shows the impact of Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications.
About Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications
This paper, published in 1998, received 663 indexed citations . Written by Ian Hutchby and Robin Wooffitt covering the research area of Language and Linguistics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (429 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (213 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (157 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w28662241.