Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues.

1.7k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2008, received 1.7k indexed citations. Written by Oliver P. John, Laura P. Naumann and Christopher J. Soto covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (823 citations), Social Psychology (618 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (465 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w28555988 →

Countries where authors are citing Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w28555988.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026