Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology
- Authors
- Wolfgang Köhler
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w28538166 →Countries where authors are citing Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology
This map shows the geographic impact of Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology
This network shows the impact of Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology.
About Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology
This paper, published in 1970, received 481 indexed citations . Written by Wolfgang Köhler covering the research area of Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (187 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (169 citations) and Social Psychology (109 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w28538166.