Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.
- Authors
- Henri BismuthMarvin B. Corlette
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w27841162 →Countries where authors are citing Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.
This map shows the geographic impact of Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.
This network shows the impact of Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver..
About Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.
This paper, published in 1975, received 528 indexed citations . Written by Henri Bismuth and Marvin B. Corlette covering the research area of Surgery and Hepatology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (510 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (450 citations) and Oncology (206 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w27841162.