The Mediterranean Basins : Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen
Impact in
- Geophysics 676
Classified as
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w27697640 →Countries where authors are citing The Mediterranean Basins : Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen
This map shows the geographic impact of The Mediterranean Basins : Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Mediterranean Basins : Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Mediterranean Basins : Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Mediterranean Basins : Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen
This network shows the impact of The Mediterranean Basins : Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Mediterranean Basins : Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen.
About The Mediterranean Basins : Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen
This paper, published in 1999, received 741 indexed citations . Written by Bernard Durand, Laurent Jolivet, F Horváth and Michel Séranne covering the research area of Geophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geophysics (676 citations), Atmospheric Science (152 citations), Paleontology (90 citations), Artificial Intelligence (87 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (83 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w27697640.