UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections

534 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2009, received 534 indexed citations. Written by James M. Murphy, David M. H. Sexton, Geoff Jenkins, Ben Booth, Matthew Collins, Glen Harris, Elizabeth Kendon, Richard Betts, Simon J. Brown and Mark McCarthy covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (282 citations), Water Science and Technology (132 citations) and Atmospheric Science (111 citations). Published in UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w2752211 →

Countries where authors are citing UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections more than expected).

Fields of papers citing UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the UK Climate Projections Science Report: Climate Change Projections.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w2752211.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026