Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w27242759 →Countries where authors are citing Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies
This network shows the impact of Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies.
About Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies
This paper, published in 2009, received 246 indexed citations . Written by Reza Zanjirani Farahani and Masoud Hekmatfar covering the research area of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (126 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (110 citations) and Building and Construction (53 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w27242759.