The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology - an overview
Impact in
- Authors
- Peter R. Vail
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w25790321 →Countries where authors are citing The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology - an overview
This map shows the geographic impact of The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology - an overview. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology - an overview with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology - an overview more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology - an overview
This network shows the impact of The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology - an overview. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology - an overview.
About The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology - an overview
This paper, published in 1991, received 653 indexed citations . Written by Peter R. Vail. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Earth-Surface Processes (470 citations), Atmospheric Science (376 citations), Paleontology (275 citations), Geophysics (191 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (165 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w25790321.