The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

458 indexed citations
published 2009
Journal
Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w2349077 →

Countries where authors are citing The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto.

About The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

This paper, published in 2009, received 458 indexed citations . Written by Jacob L. Vigdor, Edward L. Glaeser and David Cutler covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (389 citations), Economics and Econometrics (225 citations), General Health Professions (67 citations), Education (60 citations) and Urban Studies (43 citations). Published in Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w2349077.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact