Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs.
- Authors
- Ventola Cl
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w22700628 →Countries where authors are citing Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs.
This map shows the geographic impact of Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs.
This network shows the impact of Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs..
About Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs.
This paper, published in 2017, received 598 indexed citations . Written by Ventola Cl covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (298 citations), Biomedical Engineering (251 citations) and Molecular Biology (194 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w22700628.