An update on monitoring stellar orbits in the Galactic Center
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w22696630 →Countries where authors are citing An update on monitoring stellar orbits in the Galactic Center
This map shows the geographic impact of An update on monitoring stellar orbits in the Galactic Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An update on monitoring stellar orbits in the Galactic Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An update on monitoring stellar orbits in the Galactic Center more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An update on monitoring stellar orbits in the Galactic Center
This network shows the impact of An update on monitoring stellar orbits in the Galactic Center. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An update on monitoring stellar orbits in the Galactic Center.
About An update on monitoring stellar orbits in the Galactic Center
This paper, published in 2017, received 337 indexed citations . Written by S. Gillessen, P. M. Plewa, F. Eisenhauer, Re’em Sari, Idel Waisberg, M. Habibi, O. Pfuhl, E. M. George, Jason Dexter and Thomas Ott covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (332 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (118 citations), Instrumentation (26 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (20 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (14 citations). Published in MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w22696630.