Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism

756 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 756 indexed citations. Written by Harold Garfinkel and Anne Warfield Rawls covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (272 citations), Language and Linguistics (245 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (122 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w22680538 →

Countries where authors are citing Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w22680538.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026