Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review

308 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2015, received 308 indexed citations. Written by Boris Otto covering the research area of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (180 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (49 citations) and Management Information Systems (44 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w20556276 →

Countries where authors are citing Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w20556276.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026