The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III
Impact in
- Instrumentation 296
Classified as
- Journal
- Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2046416 →Countries where authors are citing The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III
This map shows the geographic impact of The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III
This network shows the impact of The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III.
About The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III
This paper, published in 2012, received 751 indexed citations . Written by Licia Verde, David J. Schlegel, Antonio J. Cuesta and Scott F. Anderson covering the research area of Instrumentation and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (730 citations), Instrumentation (296 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (144 citations), Ecology (62 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (49 citations). Published in Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2046416.