1 Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries*
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Authors
- Pinelopi GoldbergNina Pavcnik
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w19584911 →Countries where authors are citing 1 Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries*
This map shows the geographic impact of 1 Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries*. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by 1 Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries* with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 1 Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries* more than expected).
Fields of papers citing 1 Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries*
This network shows the impact of 1 Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries*. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the 1 Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries*.
About 1 Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries*
This paper, published in 2006, received 814 indexed citations . Written by Pinelopi Goldberg and Nina Pavcnik covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (588 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (548 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (217 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w19584911.