SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization
- Authors
- Eckart Zitzler
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w19461265 →Countries where authors are citing SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization
This map shows the geographic impact of SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization more than expected).
Fields of papers citing SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization
This network shows the impact of SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization.
About SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization
This paper, published in 2002, received 829 indexed citations . Written by Eckart Zitzler covering the research area of General Health Professions and Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (519 citations), Artificial Intelligence (496 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (99 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w19461265.