A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1942446 →Countries where authors are citing A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007.
This map shows the geographic impact of A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007.
This network shows the impact of A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007..
About A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007.
This paper, published in 2009, received 393 indexed citations . Written by Julie Beaulac, Elizabeth Kristjansson and Steven Cummins covering the research area of General Health Professions, Plant Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (244 citations), General Health Professions (153 citations) and Plant Science (110 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1942446.