The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w19367684 →Countries where authors are citing The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect.
This map shows the geographic impact of The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect.
This network shows the impact of The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect..
About The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect.
This paper, published in 1989, received 887 indexed citations . Written by Louise Gauthier, François Dehaut and Yves Joanette covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (687 citations), Pharmacology (162 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (108 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w19367684.